*English follows Japanese
■Title(件名)：
回答を削除後の ID について
About IDs after responses are deleted

■Description(内容):
ID 1-10 の回答を削除すると、次の回答は ID 11 から始まります。
これが、ID 1 から回答が記録されるようにリセットする機能の追加を希望します。

Power Automate の動作確認も含めてテストで送信した回答を、実運用で使用する際に削除して使用するという背景があります。
フォームをコピーすることでコピーしたフォームでは ID 1 から回答が始まりますが、Form ID が変わるので、テスト送信したフォームをそのまま使用したいと考えています。
現時点では、テストで送信した ID 1-10 の回答を削除すると、実運用で送信した回答が ID 11 からになるので、ID 1 から始まるようにしたいです。

If you deleted the responses with IDs 1-10, the next response will be given the ID 11.
Please add a way to reset the ID numbering so that it starts from 1 again.

The background for this is that we use test responses which include checks of Power Automate behavior.
If you copy the form, response IDs start from 1 again, but since this causes the Form ID to change, we would like to be able to use the form for which we sent tests as-is.
At present, deleting the test responses with IDs 1-10 causes responses in actual use to start from 11, so please add a way to reset them to start from 1.

We educators need some extra features in forms. Please, put our ideas across because great design comes from multi discipline teams and inputting ideas.
Here is the list:-
1. An option to stop students skipping back to earlier questions.
2. Basic formatting functions that educators can use to colour text or bold text in the questions and subtitles.
3. More questions types such as matching, drag and drop, gap fill.
4. In text questions the ability to format and layout text in the answer area for students. At the moment if students write an essay the layout is one single block of text.
5. A way to insert audio and restrict the number of times they can listen. At the moment you have to put the audio on a presentation slide then save it as a video file as a work around, but they can still listen as many times as they want.
6. And a function which if the students reduce the forms application window then the application will submit the work. This is an anti cheating function because as it is now students can surf the internet by just reducing forms window and then enlarge to paste in the words/sentences from the internet. For programmers at MS this will be a piece of cake or cookie. However for educators we have the ideas but not the ability to program.

1. A section subtotal which is not available at the moment.

The positive affirmation provided to respondents by Forms (at the head of the survey page) when a survey owner will have access to Name and email information is useful - could Forms provide a similar affirmation when a survey owner will not have access to this information?

e.g. The survey owner will only have access to your responses below, Forms will not share your Name or email address, (unless you provide this in response to a survey question).

This would be particularly useful for reassuring users completing surveys that are organisation-restricted (so users need to be authenticated), but are anonymous, rather than relying on the absence of the note used in 'identifiable' surveys.

My Idea is, it would be vergy goog for the user, when you can see what you write in an input field with over 40 signs in the query selection funktion inkl. the function -other- without to scroll letter by letter to check your whole text. It sould be automatically adjusting input fields.
A long answer is possible, but the user can´t see his whole text after 40 letters. So If he want to check his answer her has to scroll sign by sign. Also when you want to print an Forms Answer via PDF, you can´t see the whole answer in the input fields. Only when you export it to excel.....